When Hospitals Overbill and Insurers Underpay, Understanding the Tug of War in Claim Settlement

Your loved one is recovering. You exhale, thinking the worst is over.

But then the hospital bill arrives — and your relief turns into disbelief.

The insurer calls it inflated. The hospital insists it’s accurate.

And you? You’re trapped in the crossfire, wondering why, after paying every premium on time, you’re now fighting another battle — this time, not for health, but for justice.

The hospital staff simply replies, “Talk to your insurer.” The voice on the other end says,

“Please contact your hospital; these charges are unreasonable.”

And just like that, the rope is pulled from both ends — by hospitals overbilling and insurers underpaying — while the policyholder is stuck painfully in the middle, clinging to the hope that someone, somewhere, will do the right thing.

 

1. The Unseen Tug of War: Two Giants, One Victim

This silent struggle between hospitals and insurers defines countless insurance claim-related issues in India today. Hospitals claim they’re charging “industry standard” rates. Insurers insist they’re simply “applying policy terms.”

But what they both forget is that in this tug of war, the person getting pulled apart is the policyholder.

Because as the family prepares to go home, another war begins — one fought not with medicines, but with documents, invoices, and denial letters.

2. The Hospital’s Perspective: “We Gave You the Best Care”

Hospitals argue that every rupee charged reflects quality, safety, and expertise. Yet, many insured patients experience inflated or opaque billing.

It starts small — a ₹1,000 consumable becomes ₹3,000, a routine blood test billed at ₹4,000. 

The result? Patients are handed bills that insurers call “excessive” or “unjustified,” leading to claim rejection or delay in claim process due to ‘standard verification process’.

And the patient — emotionally and financially drained — is left asking, “Why am I paying for their fight?”

 

3. The Insurer’s Justification: “We Follow Policy Terms”

On the flip side, insurance companies operate within strict guidelines. They speak the language of sub-limits, exclusions, and non-payables.

To them, a ₹3,000 room when your policy allows ₹2,500 is a breach. A cotton swab charged at ₹200 is non-medical.

Their process may be “as per terms,” but to a family struggling to discharge a patient, it feels like punishment for falling ill. And that’s where claim rejection-related issues multiply — when rigid policy interpretation meets the messy unpredictability of real human lives.

The real losers? Families who did everything right, and yet found themselves in a triangle of blame — the hospital points to the insurer, the insurer points to “policy terms,” and the family just wants closure.

The delay in claim process drains not just their wallets, but their hope. And what should’ve been a financial cushion turns into a financial cliff.

4. Understanding the Common Flashpoints

Below is a table summarising where things often go wrong — and why policyholders need to be alert before the crisis hits.

Common Conflict Point	What Happens in Reality	Impact on Policyholder
Inflated hospital bills	Overcharging insured patients under “package” names	Insurer deducts “unreasonable” amounts
Room rent limits	Higher room category chosen due to non-availability	Proportionate deductions on the entire bill
Consumable exclusions	Items labelled as “non-medical”	Major cost reductions
Cashless claims denied	Hospital not on insurer’s panel	Patient pays upfront
Delayed discharge	Claim settlement taking too long	Emotional and financial strain
Pre-authorization errors	Missing documents or unclear forms	Claim held “under review”
Insurer “disallowance”	Policy clauses misinterpreted	Wrongful claim rejection
Hospital withholding papers	Pending payments or confusion	Delayed reimbursement
Miscommunication	Between the insurer, TPA, and the hospital	Endless back-and-forth with no resolution

 

5. What Experts Like Bima Seva Kendra Can Do For You

This is where organisations like Bima Seva Kendra (BSK) bridge the chasm. With a century of cumulative experience, their team doesn’t just process claims — they fight for fairness.

True to their philosophy — “Seva Parmo Dharm” (Service is the Highest Duty) — BSK approaches every case with a balance of legal precision and human empathy. Because firms offering claim rejection services aren’t just negotiators — they’re translators between two powerful systems that rarely speak human.

Here’s how experts like them can turn chaos into clarity:

Your Problem	Our Solution
Inflated hospital bill or unexplained deductions	Legal audit of billing with direct hospital communication
Claim delayed due to missing documents	End-to-end coordination and submission on your behalf
Claim rejection citing “policy exclusion”	Legal interpretation and appeal with detailed representation
Rejection despite valid documents	Filing of complaint under IRDAI/Consumer Forum with full documentation
Short settlement of Health insurance claim	Representation for balance payment or re-evaluation
Policy misinterpretation by insurers	Legal drafting and appeal for policy correction
Total communication breakdown	Acting as your single point of contact to bring both sides to the table

These aren’t theoretical promises — they’re real interventions, backed by years of experience and a mission rooted in compassion. Because it’s not just about money — it’s about restoring fairness to a process that’s forgotten compassion.

 

Conclusion: Healing Beyond Hospitals

The true recovery of a patient isn’t just physical — it’s financial and emotional too.

When a hospital’s warmth turns into cold arithmetic and an insurer’s empathy hides behind policy clauses, that’s when “Seva Parmo Dharm” becomes more than a motto — it becomes a movement.

Because healing doesn’t end when the doctor signs the discharge summary. 

It ends when the claim is settled, fairly and fully.

Until hospitals and insurers learn to pull together instead of apart, Bima Seva Kendra will keep standing in the middle — not as a referee, but as a protector of what truly matters: TRUST.

---